SERIOUS SHORTCOMINGS

Man wrongfully sentenced to 7 years and 6 months in prison for gender-based violence by judge who fabricated sentence

Demolishing verdict of the Provincial Court annulling the sentence of the Criminal Court No. 1 of Ibiza for serious procedural irregularities: it used 20 pages with arguments from the laws of Chile, the defendant could not be assisted by a lawyer and a key witness was recused when it is prohibited.
El Palacio de Justicia, sede del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Baleares (TSJIB) y la Audiencia Provincial
El Palacio de Justicia, sede del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Baleares (TSJIB) y la Audiencia Provincial, en la plaza Weyler de Palma

The Provincial Court of Palma de Mallorca has annulled the sentence issued by the Criminal Court No. 1 of Ibiza in a case of gender violenceafter identifying serious procedural irregularities, including the absence of legal assistance for the defendant in a critical part of the proceedings and the use of 20 pages of Chilean legal arguments to justify the decision. The court concluded that these actions violated the fundamental rights of the defendant, who was initially sentenced to prison for crimes of habitual abuse, injuries, coercion and threats.

The court noted in its judgment 00466/2024 from October 15, 2024 that the trial judge “dismissed at the beginning of the hearing the preliminary question (in which the defendant’s defense requested the nullity of the entire investigation, except for the initial statement) based on the following argument: ‘the instruction is made with all the legal guarantees’.“and that “subsequently, in the judgment, in the first ground, the judge after transcribing 20 pages from a publication on nullity in a foreign country, we believe that ChileThe court concludes that no right has been violated to the defendant because he had counsel throughout the proceedings until 22/12/2022 appointed new counsel address”. “Rarely have we seen in a procedure so many legal violations and violations of the right of defense and effective judicial protection”, warned the court.

Specifically, the Criminal Court No. 1 of Ibiza sentenced the defendant, surnamed Borja, to sentences totaling 7 years and 6 months in prison for four crimes: habitual mistreatment, injuries, occasional mistreatment and coercion. In addition to the prison sentences, he was ordered to stay away from and forbid communication with the victim, named Milagros, for 4 years, as well as the deprivation of possession and carrying of weapons. He was also sentenced to compensate the victim with 17,739.50 euros for injuries and after-effects, a sum that had already been deposited by the defendant in court.

Contenido relacionado  IbDona launches a new toll-free telephone number for victims of gender violence

Serious flaws in the instruction

The case, which began in 2019, presented multiple irregularities from the pre-trial phase. The defendant did not have access to a lawyer during the preliminary proceedings or in part of the intermediate phase, which prevented him from being able to actively participate in the process or appeal key resolutions. The Court declared: “An essential rule of the procedure has been disregarded, such as being a party under investigation assisted by a lawyer, causing him serious material defencelessness”. The court also detected other deficiencies, such as the recusal of a key witness by the judge, a figure that, according to the Court, is not contemplated in the Criminal Procedure Law: “The judge left without effect the testimony of a witness proposed by the defense, when the recusal is only applicable to experts, not to witnesses”, stated the ruling.

Retroactive action to guarantee rights

The Audiencia determined that the proceedings should be backdated to January 9, 2020, when the defendant was formally incorporated into the case after testifying as an investigated person. This implies that the instruction should be restarted in order to guarantee the defendant’s rights, including his active participation and the possibility of proposing evidence. “The only way to safeguard all the rights at stake is to retrograde the proceedings to the time when the violations were committed,” the ruling concludes.

Continue reading

Automatic Translation Notice: This text has been automatically translated from Spanish. It may contain inaccuracies or misinterpretations. We appreciate your understanding and invite you to consult the original version for greater accuracy.

Scroll to Top
logo bandas